[TheBagman]

Let Them Eat Tofu!
By Ann Coulter
Wednesday, February 28, 2007

Even right-wingers who know that "global warming" is a crock do not seem to grasp what the tree-huggers are demanding. Liberals want mass starvation and human devastation.

Forget the lunacy of people claiming to tell us the precise temperature of planet Earth in 1918 based on tree rings. Or the fact that in the '70s liberals were issuing similarly dire warnings about "global cooling."

Simply consider what noted climatologists Al Gore and Melissa Etheridge are demanding that we do to combat their nutty conjectures about "global warming." They want us to starve the productive sector of fossil fuel and allow the world's factories to grind to a halt. This means an end to material growth and a cataclysmic reduction in wealth.

There are more reputable scientists defending astrology than defending "global warming," but liberals simply announce that the debate has been resolved in their favor and demand that we shut down all production.

They think they can live in a world of only Malibu and East Hampton -- with no Trentons or Detroits. It does not occur to them that someone has to manufacture the tiles and steel and glass and solar panels that go into those "eco-friendly" mansions, and someone has to truck it all to their beachfront properties, and someone else has to transport all the workers there to build it. (And then someone has to drive the fleets of trucks delivering the pachysandra and bottled water every day.)

Liberals are already comfortably ensconced in their beachfront estates, which they expect to be unaffected by their negative growth prescriptions for the rest of us.

There was more energy consumed in the manufacture, construction and maintenance of Leonardo DiCaprio's Malibu home than is needed to light the entire city of Albuquerque, where there are surely several men who can actually act. But he has solar panels to warm his house six degrees on chilly Malibu nights.

Liberals haven't the foggiest idea how the industrial world works. They act as if America could reduce its vast energy consumption by using fluorescent bulbs and driving hybrid cars rather than SUVs. They have no idea how light miraculously appears when they flick a switch or what allows them to go to the bathroom indoors in winter -- luxuries Americans are not likely to abandon because Leo DiCaprio had solar panels trucked into his Malibu estate.

Our lives depend on fossil fuel. Steel plants, chemical plants, rubber plants, pharmaceutical plants, glass plants, paper plants -- those run on energy. There are no Mother Earth nursery designs in stylish organic cotton without gas-belching factories, ships and trucks, and temperature-controlled, well-lighted stores. Windmills can't even produce enough energy to manufacture a windmill.

Because of the industrialization of agriculture -- using massive amounts of fossil fuel -- only 2 percent of Americans work in farming. And yet they produce enough food to feed all 300 million Americans, with plenty left over for export. When are liberals going to break the news to their friends in Darfur that they all have to starve to death to save the planet?

"Global warming" is the left's pagan rage against mankind. If we can't produce industrial waste, then we can't produce. Some of us -- not the ones with mansions in Malibu and Nashville is my guess -- are going to have to die. To say we need to reduce our energy consumption is like saying we need to reduce our oxygen consumption.

Liberals have always had a thing about eliminating humans. Stalin wanted to eliminate the kulaks and Ukranians, vegetarian atheist Adolf Hitler wanted to eliminate the Jews, Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger wanted to eliminate poor blacks, DDT opponent Rachel Carson wanted to eliminate Africans (introduction to her book "Silent Spring" written by ... Al Gore!), and population-control guru Paul Ehrlich wants to eliminate all humans.

But global warming is the most insane, psychotic idea liberals have ever concocted to kill off "useless eaters." If we have to live in a pure "natural" environment like the Indians, then our entire transcontinental nation can only support about 1 million human beings. Sorry, fellas -- 299 million of you are going to have to go.

Proving that the "global warming" campaign is nothing but hatred of humanity, these are the exact same people who destroyed the nuclear power industry in this country 30 years ago.

If we accept for purposes of argument their claim that the only way the human race can survive is with clean energy that doesn't emit carbon dioxide, environmentalists waited until they had safely destroyed the nuclear power industry to tell us that. This proves they never intended for us to survive.

"Global warming" is the liberal's stalking horse for their ultimate fantasy: The whole U.S. will look like Amagansett, with no one living in it except their even-tempered maids (for "diversity"), themselves and their coterie (all, presumably, living in solar-heated mansions, except the maids who will do without electricity altogether). The entire fuel-guzzling, tacky, beer-drinking, NASCAR-watching middle class with their over-large families will simply have to die.

It seems not to have occurred to the jet set that when California is as poor as Mexico, they might have trouble finding a maid. Without trucking, packaging, manufacturing, shipping and refrigeration in their Bel-Air fantasy world, they'll be chasing the rear-end of an animal every time their stomachs growl and killing small animals for pelts to keep their genitals warm.

Ann Coulter is the legal correspondent for Human Events and author of Godless: The Church of Liberalism .

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/c...28/2007&page=1

[The_Kelzor]

yeah liberals suck

[stoned jude]

need my glasses

[Crash]

YEAH ANN COULTER, YOU DRAW YOUR CONCEPTUALIZED CONCLUSIONS BASED OFF YOUR OWN PARANOIA AND IDIOCY, THEN REAM AGAINST THOSE LIBERALS FOR IDEAS THEY CAME UP WITH IN YOUR HEAD!!!

dumbass apparently still thinks the hippies all grew up into executives and now control the world. reading one of her blogs makes me want to fuckin puke, all she does is make falsified accusations and then attack the liberals because of those accusations she invented.

the world changes, so must we. thats called.......EVOLUTION, OH GOD NO! NOT THAT SATANIC LIBERAL WORD! SAVE ME BABY JESUS FROM THESE GODLESS SODOMITES THAT BELIEVE EVIDENCE INSTEAD OF SOMEONES DRUGGED UP CONCEPT OF GOD WRITTEN 2000 YEARS AGO! if she REALLY needs more proof of global climate change, just ask the midwest about the month straight of weekly tornado producing storms theyve gotten so far.

its global climate change, not global warming, not global cooling. take it like this.

you have a car on a wet one lane road fenced in on either side. the car slips and hits a guardrail, the bounces off and hits the other, and keeps bouncing off either side until the car either flips over, or dissipates all of its energy.

now, flipping the car in this case would represent some sort of dramatic climate change on earth, which is most likely never going to happen unless the planet's orbit was thrown off. our climate (car) will most likely bounce off the guardrails a bunch of times until it stops and can re stabilize. meanwhile were inside the car getting the shit beaten out of us. its just physics. pollution will serve to destabilize the climate for years to come, and were along for the ride whether we admit it or not.

[stoned jude]

remember
we are in the midst of the NEW AGE! at the begining(dawning) of the age of aquarious peoples gathered at different points around the planet. It was said there would be 20 to 25 years of rought times then the world be be at peace....
the dawning was in august of '87. i think we are gonna need those 5 years...thats what 's happening...thias has b een celebrated over the ages...the age of aquarious

[stoned jude]

gather ye all ye crystals

[AnnonUSA]

Judes gone over the hedge!

Hey all I know is my Gas bill for January was over $440.00 so I'm all for a winter warming trend, I'm tired of being raped for Gas and Electricity....

[TheBagman]

I knew you wouldn't dissapoint Crash. I giggled the entire time reading the response, as I posted this knowing full well you'd love this article and take it to heart.

Originally Posted by Crash

YEAH ANN COULTER, YOU DRAW YOUR CONCEPTUALIZED CONCLUSIONS BASED OFF YOUR OWN PARANOIA AND IDIOCY, THEN REAM AGAINST THOSE LIBERALS FOR IDEAS THEY CAME UP WITH IN YOUR HEAD!!!

dumbass apparently still thinks the hippies all grew up into executives and now control the world. reading one of her blogs makes me want to fuckin puke, all she does is make falsified accusations and then attack the liberals because of those accusations she invented.

the world changes, so must we. thats called.......EVOLUTION, OH GOD NO! NOT THAT SATANIC LIBERAL WORD! SAVE ME BABY JESUS FROM THESE GODLESS SODOMITES THAT BELIEVE EVIDENCE INSTEAD OF SOMEONES DRUGGED UP CONCEPT OF GOD WRITTEN 2000 YEARS AGO! if she REALLY needs more proof of global climate change, just ask the midwest about the month straight of weekly tornado producing storms theyve gotten so far.

its global climate change, not global warming, not global cooling. take it like this.

you have a car on a wet one lane road fenced in on either side. the car slips and hits a guardrail, the bounces off and hits the other, and keeps bouncing off either side until the car either flips over, or dissipates all of its energy.

now, flipping the car in this case would represent some sort of dramatic climate change on earth, which is most likely never going to happen unless the planet's orbit was thrown off. our climate (car) will most likely bounce off the guardrails a bunch of times until it stops and can re stabilize. meanwhile were inside the car getting the shit beaten out of us. its just physics. pollution will serve to destabilize the climate for years to come, and were along for the ride whether we admit it or not.

[MargaRITAville]

Originally Posted by AnnonUSA

Judes gone over the hedge!

Hey all I know is my Gas bill for January was over $440.00 so I'm all for a winter warming trend, I'm tired of being raped for Gas and Electricity....

Ouch thats pretty steep, is that the average on cold months?

[gilligan]

Natural Climate Change May Be Larger Than Commonly Thought

Science Daily — A new study of climate in the Northern Hemisphere for the past 2000 years shows that natural climate change may be larger than generally thought. This is displayed in results from scientists at the Stockholm University, made in cooperation with Russian scientists, which are published in Nature on 10 Feb 2005.

The most widespread picture of climate variability in the last millennium suggests that only small changes occurred before the year 1900, and then a pronounced warming set in. The new results rather show an appreciable temperature swing between the 12th and 20th centuries, with a notable cold period around AD 1600. A large part of the 20th century had approximately the same temperature as the 11th and 12th centuries. Only the last 15 years appear to be warmer than any previous period of similar length.

This study builds on an analysis of indirect climate data, such as information from ocean and lake bottoms, ice sheets, caves and annual tree rings. The use of this kind of material to reconstruct climate far back in the past is nothing new in itself. The difference between the new study from previous ones, is the selection of data series and the method used to estimate temperatures from them.

A 1000-year long climate simulation, undertaken (by another research group) with a computer model for the physics of the atmosphere and the oceans, show large similarities with the new reconstruction. The climate in this model is governed by reconstructed variations of solar radiation and the amount of volcanic dust in the atmosphere (which reflects sun-light back into space). The fact that these two climate evolutions, which have been obtained completely independently of each other, are very similar supports the case that climate shows an appreciable natural variability - and that changes in the sun's output and volcanic eruptions on the earth may be the cause.

This means that it is difficult to distinguish the human influence on climate from natural variability, even though the past 15 warm years are best explained if one includes human influence in the simulations. The new study underscores the importance of including natural climate variability in future scenarios. It is not only the humans that can cause appreciable climate changes - nature does it all the time by itself.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0212195414.htm