[IVY]

CLAIM #2:
MARIJUANA POTENCY HAS INCREASED SUBSTANTIALLY

The claim that there has been a 10-, 20- or 30-fold increase in marijuana potency since the 1970s is used to discredit previous studies that showed minimal harm caused by the drug and convince users from earlier eras that today's marijuana is much more dangerous.

THE FACTS

For more than 20 years the government-funded Potency Monitoring Project (PMP) at the University of Mississippi has been analyzing samples of marijuana submitted by U.S. law enforcement officials. At no time have police seizures reflected the marijuana generally available to users around the country and, in the 1970s, they were over- represented by large-volume low-potency Mexican kilobricks. 8

During the 1970s, the PMP regularly reported potency averages of under 1%, with a low of 0.4% in 1974. Quite clearly, these averages underestimate the THC content of marijuana smoked during this period.

Marijuana of under 0.5% potency has almost no psychoactivity. While it is possible that people sometimes obtained marijuana of such low potency, for the drug to have become popular in the 1960s and 1970s, most people must have regularly obtained marijuana with higher THC content.
Until the late 1970s, PMP samples included none of the traditionally higher-potency cannabis products, such as buds and sinsemilla, even though these products were available on the retail market. When changes in police practices resulted in their seizure, PMP potency averages increased.

Every independent analysis of potency in the 1970s found higher THC averages than the PMP For example, the 59 samples submitted to PharmChem Laboratories in 1973 averaged 1.62%; only 16 (27%) contained less than 1% THC, more than half were over 2% and about one-fifth were over 4%. In 1975, PharmChem samples anged from 2 to 5%, with some as high as 14% - nearly 30 times the .71 average reported by the PMP 9

After 1980, both the number and variety of official seizures increased dramatically, improving the validity of the PMP's reported averages, although they continue to be based on "convenience" rather than "representative" samples.
As shown below, average potency has remained essentially unchanged since the early 1980s:


Mean Percentage THC of Seized Marijuana, 1981-1993
Mississippi Potency Monitoring Project

1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993

2.28 3.05 3.23 2.39 2.82 2.30 2.93 3.29 3.06 3.36 3.36 3.00 3.32


Even if potency had increased slightly since the 1970s, it would not mean that smoking marijuana had become more dangerous. In fact, since the primary health risk of marijuana comes from smoking, higher potency products can be less dangerous because they allow people to achieve the desired effect by inhaling less.

[elroypornlab]

I am curios were you got this imformation? Because it is a load of shit!

[IVY]

The Lindesmith Center
A Project of the Open Society Institute
Ethan Nadelmann, Director


Exposing Marijuana Myths:
A Review of the Scientific Evidence

Lynn Zimmer
Associate Professor of Sociology, Queens College
John P. Morgan
Professor of Pharmacology, City University of New York Medical School


October 1995
© Open Society Institute/The Lindesmith Center

>LOL
I Do believe the strength of pot has increased, but thats becuase people have gotten so much better at growing it, and they are more and better strains then there was at the time of this report...

[elroypornlab]

You worded that so much better then I could of, that was my point,

[IVY]

Can you imagine the strains/potencies we have availible in ... lets say... 5-10 years?

[elroypornlab]

I can only imagine that, For as far as growers have com thus far that the leap to a pure or almost pure THC plant are nearer the realized