[BigRon]

North American Union to Replace USA by Jerome R. Corsi


President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration's true open borders policy.

Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA politically, setting the stage for a North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada.

President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed.

The blueprint President Bush is following was laid out in a 2005 report entitled "Building a North American Community" published by the left-of-center Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The CFR report connects the dots between the Bush administration's actual policy on illegal immigration and the drive to create the North American Union:

At their meeting in Waco, Texas, at the end of March 2005, U.S. President George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their governments to a path of cooperation and joint action. We welcome this important development and offer this report to add urgency and specific recommendations to strengthen their efforts.

What is the plan? Simple, erase the borders. The plan is contained in a "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" little noticed when President Bush and President Fox created it in March 2005:

In March 2005, the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States adopted a Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), establishing ministerial-level working groups to address key security and economic issues facing North America and setting a short deadline for reporting progress back to their governments. President Bush described the significance of the SPP as putting forward a common commitment "to markets and democracy, freedom and trade, and mutual prosperity and security." The policy framework articulated by the three leaders is a significant commitment that will benefit from broad discussion and advice. The Task Force is pleased to provide specific advice on how the partnership can be pursued and realized.

To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity. We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders that "our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary." Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America.

The perspective of the CFR report allows us to see President Bush's speech to the nation as nothing more than public relations posturing and window dressing. No wonder President Vincente Fox called President Bush in a panic after the speech. How could the President go back on his word to Mexico by actually securing our border? Not to worry, President Bush reassured President Fox. The National Guard on the border were only temporary, meant to last only as long until the public forgets about the issue, as has always been the case in the past.

The North American Union plan, which Vincente Fox has every reason to presume President Bush is still following, calls for the only border to be around the North American Union -- not between any of these countries. Or, as the CFR report stated:

The three governments should commit themselves to the long-term goal of dramatically diminishing the need for the current intensity of the governments’ physical control of cross-border traffic, travel, and trade within North America. A long-term goal for a North American border action plan should be joint screening of travelers from third countries at their first point of entry into North America and the elimination of most controls over the temporary movement of these travelers within North America.

Discovering connections like this between the CFR recommendations and Bush administration policy gives credence to the argument that President Bush favors amnesty and open borders, as he originally said. Moreover, President Bush most likely continues to consider groups such as the Minuteman Project to be "vigilantes," as he has also said in response to a reporter's question during the March 2005 meeting with President Fox.

Why doesn’t President Bush just tell the truth? His secret agenda is to dissolve the United States of America into the North American Union. The administration has no intent to secure the border, or to enforce rigorously existing immigration laws. Securing our border with Mexico is evidently one of the jobs President Bush just won't do. If a fence is going to be built on our border with Mexico, evidently the Minuteman Project is going to have to build the fence themselves. Will President Bush protect America's sovereignty, or is this too a job the Minuteman Project will have to do for him?

[TheBagman]

Makes sense that politicians would want to expand their power to other countries.

[taco]

wtf are you doing up at this hour, did you lose your job?

[TheDriver]

taco getting all political and shit

[Edubs]

hey all I am saying is if we do become one giant country, pot will mostly be legal, and quite frankly that is all I care bout a this point in time, after losing faith in the political process.

[TheBagman]

Originally Posted by Edubs

hey all I am saying is if we do become one giant country, pot will mostly be legal, and quite frankly that is all I care bout a this point in time, after losing faith in the political process.

Why would pot most likely be legal?

[Edubs]

well it is legal in mexico as far as I know, and it is legal is some parts of canada, so I would assume we could get it legalized just for as the acticle stated for

the trade, and mutual prosperity

so in order for the pot to travel from mexico to canada and vise versa, it would have to travel through our states. so to make it easier all around legalization could be possible. well that is how my brain sees it.

[TheBagman]

As it is this is mainly for trade, not really social yet I don't see that happening. While legalizing marijuana would be a smart economical choice in many respects, it is not supported by the religious right, and the corporations that seem to have dirty politicians in their pockets so do not count on it.

I don't see how that works considering that's what we have right now, and this would only expand power. Federal government will always trump, but the founding fathers never intended the federal government to have any control of our day to day lives as long as it did not interfere with freedom and liberty.

Regardless, I fail to see how expanding government is going to somehow change things for the better, especially on stances such as drugs. If anything they should be making stronger state and local governments, and let the other countries, states, and local governments run themselves almost independently from any centralized government.

[Edubs]

I see your point.

[AnnonUSA]

this is one of the most ridiculous things I have ever heard, this would do nothing to benefit the US and Canada except create the worlds largest welfare state (mexico) and force them to pay for it. Even George Bush's puppet masters are not this dumb.