[IVY]

PA: OPED: No, Random Student Drug Testing Backfires


It's A Humiliating Violation of Privacy That Has Not Been Proven to Deter Drug Use

The Office of National Drug Control Policy descends upon Pittsburgh tomorrow to host the third of four summits around the country promoting random student drug testing. While the presenters may sound like they have all the answers to preventing drug abuse, school districts should be wary - -- if they blindly follow the drug czar's enticements to test, they could be violating the Pennsylvania Constitution.

The Delaware Valley School District learned this the hard way. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that the district's policy forcing students to consent to random alcohol and other drug testing in order to be allowed to participate in extracurricular activities or to park their cars on campus may have been unconstitutional. In the majority opinion, Justice Castille stated, "The theory apparently is that, even in the absence of any suspicion of drug or alcohol abuse, in effect: 'Choose one: your Pennsylvania constitutional right to privacy or the chess club.' "

Since the 2003 ruling, schools throughout Pennsylvania have abandoned drug testing programs, citing lack of money, legal fears and questions about whether the programs were effective.

Pennsylvanian parents, educators and judges aren't the only ones questioning the logic of random student drug testing: This is the second year of the Bush administration's student drug-testing summits as well as offers of federal funding, and yet many around the country continue to resist the administration's attempt to sell the idea.

As the mother of four, a National Institute on Drug Abuse scholar and director of a drug-abuse prevention program advocating science-based drug education for teens, I urge Pittsburgh educators and parents to be wary of "feel good" promises. Consider the very real pitfalls:

* Random drug testing has not been proven to deter drug use. In 2003, the National Institute on Drug Abuse funded the largest study ever conducted on the topic. Researchers compared 76,000 students in schools with and without drug testing and found no difference in illegal drug use between the two school environments. In a 2005 report that critiqued studies touted by the Office of National Drug Control Policy in support of random student drug testing, Professor Neil McKegany of the University of Glasgow found fundamental flaws and biases, saying, "It is a matter of concern that student drug testing has been widely developed in the United States ... on the basis of the slimmest available research evidence."

* Random drug testing alienates students; it is a humiliating violation of privacy that already self-conscious adolescents should not have to endure. Former Belle Vernon High School football coach Gary Dongilli originally pushed for testing but now says, "I'd never again advise a school system to do it," he said in an April 2004 Post-Gazette article. "There was supposed to be confidentiality with testing, but there wasn't."

* Drug testing can have the unanticipated effect of deterring students from after-school programs -- activities that would fill their time during the peak teenage drug-using hours of 3-6 p.m.

* Random testing infuses an insidious sense of suspicion into the delicate student-teacher relationship, which can create a hostile school environment. This is disturbing in light of research that shows that student connectedness with their school is an important predictor of success.

* Drug testing is expensive and inefficient. School districts across the country, including many in Pennsylvania, are in financial crisis. The Shaler Area School District scrapped its testing proposal due to budgetary concerns.

* Some argue that students need drug testing to help them say "no," but research questions this assumption. The 2004 State of Our Nation's Youth survey found that, contrary to popular belief, most teens are not pressured to use drugs. Besides, if teens don't learn how to respond to the omnipresence of the drug culture when they are in high school, when will they learn?

Drug testing may seem a panacea, but it is fraught with social, emotional and financial problems. Before we leap into a school program that seems too good to be true and uses students as guinea pigs, we should examine the many repercussions, pitfalls and alternatives to random student drug testing. Otherwise, we may be sorry.

URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v05/n730/a07.html
Newshawk: http://www.drugpolicy.org
Votes: 1
Pubdate: Thu, 05 May 2005
Source: Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (PA)
Page: B-7
Copyright: 2005 PG Publishing
Contact: letters@post-gazette.com
Website: http://www.post-gazette.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/341
Author: Marsha Rosenbaum
Note: Marsha Rosenbaum directs the Safety First drug education project at the Drug Policy Alliance (www.drugpolicy.org) and is co-author of "Making Sense of Student Drug Testing: Why Educators Are Saying No" (www.drugtestingfails.org).
Also: Printed with a contrasting OPED by John Walters http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v05.n730.a08.html
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?225 (Students - United States)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/testing.htm (Drug Testing)
NO, RANDOM STUDENT DRUG TESTING BACKFIRES