if you're into the 911 conspiracy theories---must watch

Boondock · 05-07-2005, 08:04 AM

http://www.reopen911.org/video/painf...tack_part1.wmv

http://www.reopen911.org/video/painf...tack_part2.wmv

http://www.reopen911.org/video/painf...tack_part3.wmv

http://www.reopen911.org/video/painf...k_addendum.wmv

i don't even know what to say. i mean i don't want to believe that the gov would have something to do with it but after watching several things like above, it's hard. at the very least it poses some fucking questions i'd like to have answered.

Silent Steve · 05-07-2005, 08:06 AM

why is it you always have to post kickass links to video's i really want to watch while I'm at work? Where there are no fucking speakers!!

Boondock · 05-07-2005, 08:08 AM

if you care, these documentaries claim that the bulidings were demolished with explosives that were put in the buildings before hand. it claims the terrorists were patsies.

like i said, at the very least it poses some good questions.

apparently there were 64 passengers on the flight that hit the pentagon and they didn't find any part of the 64 people or their luggage.hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

o well

Silent Steve · 05-07-2005, 08:52 AM

well dude... I mean... they hit a fuckin building...

Boondock · 05-07-2005, 08:57 AM

this is what some people believe hit the pentagon? it's a global hawk drone. am unmaned recon vehicle. it only has one small engine and matches the dimensions of the blast better than a big ass plane

another good point the made is the shuttle that blew up in 03 was miles above the earth. there were 7 people on board. they foubnd pieces of the bodies andpieces of the shuttle spread out for miles.

there were 64 people on board the "plane" that hit the pentagon. of course the blast was concentrated in a small area yet they found no remains of any of the 64 people or any of their luggage. hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.

they found 1 small piece of :"skin" they claim id from the plane, 1 small engine, and 1 rim.

the global hawk has all those too. the engines on the plane were 9 foot tall. they one they found at the site was about 2 foot tall if that.

also, the military won't release any of the secureity footage of the "plane" hitting the pentagon..why not you think?

another thing it talks about is out radar and air defense system. the "plane" that hit the pentagon was missing for an hour..they had an hour to find it on the radar and they couldn't..why not you think?

they said the plane was flying close to the ground at 400mph. a bunch of non military pilots who have flown those big boys say no way. those guys couldn't have done it. also, they would have had to make this crazy ass turn to hit the pentagon where they did cause the plane was on a different path. couldn't have happened.

it would have been possible however for the plane to nose dive into the center of the pentagon.

plus, those planes make a fuck of a lot of noise. there is no eyewitness to seeing eh plane approaching the pentagon. thats not usually something people miss.

imagine what a plane going 44 mph would sound like fllying close to the ground. that would be a loud mother whore wouldn'tit?

Boondock · 05-07-2005, 08:58 AM

Originally Posted by Silent Steve

well dude... I mean... they hit a fuckin building...

shit don't vaporize. ther would still be remains of people, luggage, and the plane man. it don't dissapear.

also, you see the hole it made?

Boondock · 05-07-2005, 09:00 AM

yet another hting is the plane weighs 60 toms when it's empty. that would make a fuck of a lot of pieces and parts on the ground don't you think?

Silent Steve · 05-07-2005, 09:01 AM

I remember some people thought the one that hit the pentagon was a missle..

Boondock · 05-07-2005, 09:04 AM

at least watch the first part guys.

yet another point is one of the planes that hit the towers was at least 1,000 feet in the air. the sound was cought on video as well as the footage and it was loud as fuck man.

if there would have been a plane flying lets say just above the cars, you have no idea how fucking insanely loud that would have been

Boondock · 05-07-2005, 09:06 AM

Originally Posted by Silent Steve

I remember some people thought the one that hit the pentagon was a missle..

that is another theory. they say the global hawk is like an eggshell with an engine. it's very light and very quiet. thats what it was designed for.

all i'm saying is if it was a hijacked plane that hit the pentagon then why dosen't the military release the security footage? i mean, how could it hurt them? it would simply prove that it was a plane. there has to be a pretty good reason as to why they won't release that footage.

mooglekexin · 05-07-2005, 09:09 AM

i REALLY fucking need broadband!

Silent Steve · 05-07-2005, 09:11 AM

Not sure where I was on the web, but ...wait, it was www.infowars.com they had something about how the feds busted into a holiday inn near the pentagon and stole some of their security footage. That supposedly had the plane on it... no warrant, no nothing..

seems rather 1984ish eh?

Boondock · 05-07-2005, 09:13 AM

mother fuck this is a good viseo. a lot of shit they are saying makes real good sense.

they showed pics of the cleanup. at the wtc, it was all guys in firesuits, workboots, gloves and shit. they were prepared. at the pentagon, you see quite a few "suits" picking up small pieces of metal. apparently, the global hawks are 50% carbon fiber resin. they had to get that shit cleaned up with the quickness.

Del420 · 05-07-2005, 09:42 AM

I don't believe this was posted, but If it was, my bad..
http://nata2.info/war/pentagon.swf

check that out, more info on the missile theory (for the pentagon)

Boondock · 05-07-2005, 09:57 AM

lots more good shit on the second video.

apparently, a fire has never, ever caused a building to crumble like that. they made a good point about the steel beams. it looks a lot more like a controlled demolition the way building 7 and the towers fell. if it was not controlled the beams would bea ll twisted and contorted and they were not.

building 7, that had a birds eye view of the towers had just got a 15 million dollar renovation. windows that were bullet proof and bomb proof. it's own air and water supply. oh, that was only for floor 23. all that woek was done before the attacks.

building 7 was on a direct course to the towers so some say that there was a signal being put out by that building. that would surely guide those planes.

why did that floor, the floor that had the best view of both towers need to be renovated with it's own air/water supply and windows that were bullet and bomb proof? i wonder if there was anyone in floor 23 of building 7 watching? i wonder what kind of equipment was in that building on that floor?

another thing about the pentagon. it shows soem stills of about 20 people carrying something away from the blast site. thing is, you can't see what it iss cause it is covered up with blue tarp and it was taken away. why did they need to cover it with tarp? i think maybe if a global hawk was involved that would be something they would want to hide. like the fuselage(sp)

gilligan · 05-07-2005, 09:58 AM

good production can make anything true.

Boondock · 05-07-2005, 10:03 AM

Originally Posted by Gilligan

good production can make anything true.

hell yes. still kinda shady that the military won't release footage. also, facts are facts.

you don't think it's odd that the beams were not twisted and warped? they were at the gov building that mcverigh blew up. in controlled demos however, they are not.

only a few beams at the tower site had to be cut with torches. most of the beams were straight and fit nice and snug on the trucks hauling them away. again, resembles controlled demos.

like i said gilligan, at the least man i think these vids and all that pose a few serious questions that need to be answered. i mean, we do have a right to know.

gilligan · 05-07-2005, 10:12 AM

we all have guns, get up a militia and go demand they tell you.